FRCP Preponderance Indicates Illegal Aliens Prone to Crime

FRCP Preponderance Indicates Illegal Aliens Prone to Crime - Jake - 10-16-2023

We MUST assume that illegal immigrants will moreso than not tend towards crime, under FRCP Civil Preponderance.

What that means is that those of us who already know know that common law and our constitution being based upon it are correct coming from the trials of evolution.

We know that there is no fence or wall between lots of white, sexually attractive and compromised Americans with no experience or knowledge in the nightmares that have been Latin America, mostly fueled by our hedonism.

So it should be no surprise that these immigrants have basically one or two things on their mind, and that would be the abduction of our children and seed and then probably a good fix to wash it all down, after all, most of those industries have been outsourced to Latin America anyway, so just duh yourselves in here.

We have on our hands a fallen empire which did so we know due to cannibalism, sacrifice and the abuse of children all likely together, as the adult version duhs.  The past 100 years of Americans riding the gravy train of The Fed's Federal fraud have done one thing and one thing only and that is ensure that there are billions of rapacious victims with lots and lots of experiences and reasons to do just that back to the US for decades on end and more.  I mean, what would you do to people who gutted your community and country and turned it into a third world to produce drugs and sex slaves for them?

FRCP entails assuming the worst under declination, per animal law...Murphys law notwithstanding.  By our own laws, that is what we are facing South of the border at our own faults, largely.

Now, that fault is part of a higher plan which has the potential to end such things more soundly altogether in the future via Secession that predates this modern version of the ancient struggle between good and evil, which is the ONLY thing holding the devil back.  But sometimes I just wonder who's who..and if we really needed to go any further than starvation with it, and if there's anyone out there critical about style points...that is all.

Who's hungry?