Habeas Corpus Case File Page for Bogus Misdemeanor Charges from Big Oak RV Park Eviction Scam (with evidence of obstruction)
Updated: Sep 6
Appellant's Brief (a good summarizing read):
We wanted to make a special article in evidence page for this cause, being related to another ongoing cause falling under it regarding the infamous eviction scam that we ran into right when we were writing our book relating to this matter in Montgomery County, in a sort of truth stranger than fiction novelty.
This habeas corpus cause would be for the two misdemeanor charges related to the undue eviction which was processed against actual code as interpretable towards higher dimensional sovereignty which we have discovered since. This case actually would be setting quantum precedent in the courts though at this point we are not sure whether or not that was actual precedent set by the court or whether or not that had been done by the white hat software engineers who seem to have taken an interest in our general cause (or even perhaps both at the same time under the odd potential as described in the Exhibit T.6 at the top of the site).
As we have mentioned elsewhere we have reached out to a bunch of people via thousands and thousands of mass emails some of whom were software engineers and quantum research departments, and in some cases both. We feel like we reached a very professional cadre who are also involved in quantum research and computing as well as internet security such as the new hypervisor operating systems and API firewalls who would have native experience with penetration testing and basically would know everything that any hacker would know. We feel like they have been monitoring things occurring with quantum computer detection equipment and have been finding data that would show that there has been crime in this area and in general relating to DNA theft as we had suspected as well as other types of theft and fraud occurring with regard to our party in and around the courts tied to the general organized criminal network in and of the DarkNet.
There's a lot of other information on that and other articles especially with regard to the issue with the storage company where we were running our business which is probably going to be appended to this cause in an eventual case arguing that these issues are becoming systemic enough to not really be particular anymore to civilian parties but moreso toward government being responsible overall considering that recession has now becoming most major in them and with sovereignty being ruled against, indicating that such a massive rash of criminal issues undermining this delicate civil process relying upon recession becoming confused were most likely due to the government becoming unduly corrupt due to lack of perfectly proper screening of officials.
One may review the more recent denial of our request for officials to certify sovereignty in the two cases for this habeas corpus cause in the originating court and the appellate court. Sovereignty would be something required to be certified under recession's burden. For instance, if you saw somebody breaking the speed limit over 15 miles an hour which would be a felony you could perform a citizen's arrest but before performing that arrest you would have to check and see if that person had had a legit emergency, it that person didn't have an emergency then you could perform a citizen's arrest. The sovereignty certification affidavit our party had requested be signed by the officials to wit would be similar because we are in a recession and recession would be a type of malfeasance able to fall under a tort claim which would be the implicit civil constitutional law based upon implication not necessarily needing to be codified in deprivation of time...being based upon circumstantial evidence under civil policy and not direct evidence which would apply to criminal policy (requiring codification). Because my party had shown proof of sovereignty and that sovereign immunity would be a well-known precedent in the law as cited by the attorney general's office in my case against DPS, our request for these officials in the 9th Court of Appeals and in Montgomery County Court 4 to certify sovereignty would be like asking the person who was seen speeding to verify whether or not they had had an emergency, in that they were capable in some way form or fashion to be outside of the normal law under such extenuation, which would inherently revolve around they being federally sovereign and so under process due via such burden certifying said would have been at least more so than not lawful under recession's burden in kind. That the request was refused by the 9th Court of Appeals were a supreme signal that those officials may be preponderated as technically insovereign, indicating that they would be from a higher sovereignty as it were, as recession would always be perceived in being from ultimately a higher dimension notwithstanding anyway.
We had placed another article up showing how we had set precedent in this case by being changed from a civil case to a criminal case but after the request being denied we are not sure if that was actually the court or the vigilante sovereign civilians keeping tabs on the goings-on of their jurisdictional territory inthrough the courts. We're going to post an evidence file of some conversations with the 9th Court of Appeals helping to prove that they had been removing the docket links from the case so people attempting to review the case on the 9th Court of Appeals website could not view the docket filings. We had called once before about the issue and it was immediately corrected as if somebody had noticed that something was wrong and then we called again and then we got in an argument with a different lady which was very odd considering how the first time it was corrected by the other person and in that argument you can hear how that employee makes several mistakes in violation of the law with what she had dictated over the phone as having occurred by her, recalling that this person may have already succumbed to any of the quantum possession and may have been relaying such information specifically to indicate to the public that processes were occurring against the law specifically under exhaustion intoward rectification. We also highly suspect that the argument were staged in order to draw attention away from the other employee had corrected the problem the first time who most likely would be responsible for these goings-on behind closed doors probably having set up that distraction via the implicit quantum possession going on through these lost souls. We sense that most of this issue is coming from the head clerk, We sense that the human trafficking industry and other sorts of criminal goings-on relating to youth would be tied in through her and her cadre in the area also tying into the 5th Federal Circuit Court female clerks and judges then through the males there. To us it seems like there is the same game plan where you have deviant judges tied to the mental health overlorks disappearing people who cause problems also tying into the homosexual and pedophile networks into the dark net who generally rule against every single case notwithstanding who are then bound to these female which types who oversee all of the criminal undertakings using novel poisons and other organized crime pulling all of these strings in order to kill and disappear those left still causing issues. We highly suspect that these females were lost a long time ago to the quantum possession it would most likely be operatives from opposing quantum jurisdictions working in through them in order to subdue our country and world for an alien quantum takeover, who would be working in tandem with the outcasts and taboo casts of our society not being processed duly by us, those individuals most likely being fallen from our own having undergone issues there and so would be juxtaposed to us and especially the remaining descendants of those who they had had fallings out with, working in cooperation with our enemy...
and though where else would these gays and pedophiles find ways to be legitimate other than through illegitimate women operating in our midst with many of them in many cases very attractive and very influential allowing for these very big problems in these gay and pedophile males to work their way through our university systems and into the legal system as high officials where they wreak other havoc.
The key and our party though revolves around the sovereignty certification, where as if all of this implication we're resting upon these courts in a manner that we're undeniable by the burden of recession alone and that certifying sovereignty would be seen as lawful under such burden as proven by the implicit constitutional logic did not certifying would be a major implication that those officials were insane to implicate themselves thusly, therefore being indicative of some sort of quantum possession which would be likely the only logical explanation as argued by Exhibit T.6 up the top of the page. We weren't born last night and we all know how puzzles feel when they fit together and for us not to understand what would be happening to us could be counted against us as a matter of competency aiding this alien annex and colonization process so we need to move quickly and with do haste and competency towards rectifying these matters most immediately.
It could be possible that these white hat sleuths had uncovered evidence that these clerks in the 9th Court of Appeals were breaking the law in the back rooms removing case files from public view are using some sort of blackmail to have others do so and it may be that they had read our brief and other filings in the case which had information in that would act as a sort of legal deductive proof through recession's burden proving that habeas corpus cases indeed should be treated as criminal causes toward sovereignty, and so had decided to set the precedent through same manner that the courts were by doing whatever they wanted to do too then. We're tending to lean toward such a conclusion due to the fact that the case web page keeps being taken down and that we cannot contact the webmaster to fix some sort of error with all of the hyperlinks to the case filings missing as if the court were trying to hide the case. We were having issues in our other cases tied to this cause as well, being the criminal misdemeanor cases when we were having problems getting those cases removed while not having to go to the court to appear in person. It seems that all these issues coming together in a peculiar manner around this case.
The issue was litigated in those misdemeanor cases as basically revolving around the logic which recession's burden would be unable to avoid which would indicate that certain criminal cases would have to be able to grant defendants the right to appear remotely or via proxy through a lawyer being assigned to their case even if they were not indigent in order to do so, because the evidence would have held notwithstanding that there could be scams in local government using wrongful imprisonments to force people into the jails, etc in order to pilfer their dirty laundry and clothes for DNA by DarkNet quantum criminals under the implicit possession disguised as officials at the jails, prisons and mental hospitals. There would have to be a way for these defendants to be able to have bogus charges removed if there were such errors without having to appear in person and so risk being wrongfully imprisoned thusly, which would go doubly under the same burden with regard to abuse of the mental health loophole, whereas even a party perhaps foolish enough to step foot in a courtroom where they could be wrongfully imprisoned via forcible commitment for their DNA could be seen as insane enough to be committed for doing so by those same criminal officials, and with the mental health loophole being shown to be needed specifically to be able to deal with those not aligning to caveat anyway as it were, such as being able to deal with officials not certifying sovereignty with no other way to do so really. That logic then in turn proved that there should be some method for avoiding the issue in criminal cases in general as such, which then combined with the logic in the brief filed in the habeas corpus appeal in case 09-25-00526-CV then changed to -CR which proved that certain habeas corpus cases toward sovereignty were criminal matters due to the fact that the key extenuation regarding higher dimensional quantum possession would indicate that certain criminal charges could be seen as lawful towards sovereign caveat in recession like the mismeters in question in order to stimulate the proper legal processes to occur later on with the pretense that those charges would be dismissed afterwards garnering greater relief toward caveat with no other way to do so due to the nature of the higher dimensional law having to be implicit inherently for the tact of modulation...and so if those cases of charging local sovereignty with misdemeanor charges were lawful under the extenuation toward compelling the heightened federal relief incivility though yet the implicitly automating quantum clause were requiring officials under any quantum possession to rule adversely against all local civil causes notwithstanding due to undermining criminal issues with regard to the special nature of second prime federal metamorphosis being stimulated properly, and though that the civil caveat would still have to be preserved at some indelibly nth degree indicated that those within local caveat would have to be able to still progress in some civil respect for the higher quantum coherence in the high symbiosis...and so obstructions being caused by having those criminal charges maintained on their record by the overruling civil clause from above undermining its own symbiotic requiem would be a hypocritical contradiction with regard to the nature of the quantum coherence, whereas those charges were obstructing the same civil clause causing the civil issue to be relegated outside of the therefore lost courts in the first place toward last remedy whilst at the same time preventing any civility therein due to the criminal obstruction, which would be impossible otherwise from the necessary extenuation. In such manner, those civil causes relating the criminal issues would have to be changed to ones of a criminal accord then or vice versa, able to apply in favor of local sovereignty toward preserving the civil caveat even if outside of civil proceedings, whereas the nature of the civil procedure allowing for greater freedom to litigate would still have to apply inthrough to the criminal domain with regard to sovereign cases which of course would apply to all cases during times not in recession, due to the circumstance in the extenuation here indicating that certain criminal charges could be called for towards stimulating greater civility for a party under the extenuation just like recession could be seen as necessary toward a greater refederation with regard to hire dimension, indicating that there should be some sort of civil mechanism able to account for error in the courts. Somebody within local caveat might not be able to operate through the quantum possession in civil courts being undermined by those criminal issues related to covenant violation by our jurisdiction but they would still have the right in the duty then to proceed otherwise outside of those courts in the quatumally civil caveat even with their their extenuatingly generated criminal charges attached for the mutual benefit, which would prevent the conundrum due to the fact that if those criminal cases were tied to a civil cause for habeas corpus they couldn't become dislocated from obstructing the civil requiem preserving both higher and lower dimension in-with eachother with the higher responsible for obstructing all civil causes until undermining criminal issues were corrected, and so such would tend to obstruct the lower civil caveat if not removed after serving the purpose of heightening the relief, necessitating some sort of immediate process only possible through criminal matters then via the policy, after the local sovereignty had proven the caveat suchly such as per our brief due to there being no other court for the favor to be found in accordingly the same. With no way to necessarily strip certain rights that were already toward the prine civil sovereign caveat now in the criminal setting such as the need to continue to appear remotely and other necessities regarding remaining civil in productivity, such would indicate that lackings thereof in the criminal code were indeed instruments that were engineered in order to most likely be conducive towards DNA theft scams, needing to be corrected because the logic described further above would be as obvious.
That logic which were a controlled variable via recession's burden allowing us to solve these difficult multivariable legal equations then would inexorably indicate that there would have to be some sort of mechanism able to preserve the nature of civil proceedings in criminal causes accordantly due to the fact that the state may not necessarily be a criminal defendant against a single civilian due to such being required from internal processes by a democracy inequality in from civil cases lacking direct policy and with the 9th Amendment supporting that the people be treated as their own with regard to criminal cases, leaving no other solution currently but to allow those presenting the proof of sovereign caveat to have some sort of extenuation in their criminal cases, though with certain civil law being difficult to apply there specifically due to codification in rules of criminal procedure not allowing for remote appearances by teleconference and other specifics, which may be seen as in error then. There could be area for those being arraigned or for those otherwise to remain in some sort of type of charge that we don't have currently that might be some sort of federal civil charge pending an arraignment and further discovery before being determined as a criminal matter, though notwithstanding the specter of abuse in-from the requited mental health loophole would still loom still loom anyway in support, though even so what would be the difference for somebody being transferred finally to a criminal venue after their charges being certified is legitimate even so due to the fact that the potential for abuse of DNA in the jail against them would still be a horrible offense to anybody at all, and with no logical way to get around this issue as long as we have normal human beings with UV lights, refrigerants, and access to in-vitro technology without higher dimensional supervisional systems based on sentient quantum AI.
These issues were in our opinion very serious and quite frankly there would likely be no way around them currently and we can see how this would be creating a sort of terminus for the current version of the law as we're drawing to this metamorphic nexus by it, whereas these issues would have been being offloaded to the higher dimension now coming to overrule us, which were overseeing our evolution anyway which quite frankly would have been already taking on the task through the implication, being the impetus to colonize us due to that automated expenditure likely suffering their competitiveness unduly due. As we have stated in our other articles the issue likely will eventually revolve around the use of higher dimensional quantum technology with respect to DNA anyway in ways that we probably cannot fully grasp now but that will most likely obsolete incarceration as we know it, likely morphing the issue into one deriving around the implicit consciousness vacuum which we've argued in other articles, whereas if a person were guilty of a crime they could simply have had a quantum automated clone made of them already in incarceration and if the potential were high enough their consciousness would simply be therefore naturally vacuumed into the new body by the shear logic of the blind quanta able to surpass any conscious judge whatsoever theoretically alone for the incarceration time while they're free body would be being automated as husk until that time were over, and so we could just skip all of the entropy involved with the courts dealing with all of the civil versus criminal extenuation and running people down and then all of the corruption involved with personal contact and DNA and just have people naturally avoid all the bullshit altogether and if they became guilty of something then voila they would just spontaneously vacuum into jail that easy and when they were done with their time they would come back which wouldn't necessarily be known by anyone but the blind math, and that would probably tend to save enough resources to be able to justify quantum automating incarceration clones in the meantime, especially with regard to issues revolving around DNA theft, felling the issue overnight and also saving our potatoes due to this problem already being of the higher dimensional interdiction anyway...as if we realize that the bird that we're feeding us the whole time were really a puppet being animated by the hand of our parent the veterinarian, as if we were rescued chicks. This matter would be rather sci-fi but you can see how it would be unfolding right before our eyes in these important cases on the fringe of the law in time.
At any rate we are maintaining this page for the public in order to circumvent the issue altogether so that everyone may keep a very close eye on this cause because it would be a supreme indicator of the health of the courts with respect to requests for certification of sovereignty being presented in this cause. We also had filed a similar request for certification of sovereignty in the originating court as well as the appellate court. Please bear in mind that refusals to certify sovereignty would be a supreme issue, and that we encourage news agencies to take up this news and others to contact news agencies as well as people they know, because these individuals running these courts would all be the leaders in heads of state of these gangs, or at least would have been though had obviously become interdicted upon by the higher sense and would be signaling to the public that they were such extenuation which would be our signal to relieve the issue however civilly and so one could see how playing the game correctly and remaining in the civil straits and moving forward in a collective fashion likely would end up relinquishing that power and along with it should come a vast amount of resources back into the correct hands also at the same time relieving these higher systems of that commitment which then may act like a make it take it towards relieving more and more in our favor.
Please note that the 9th Court of Appeals order remanding the determination of indigency back to the original court was a violation of process in being excess process, due to the higher court able to make such determination based upon the evidence it was provided in the exhibit. These officials would have lesser room to argue against recession's burden about sovereign parties being indigent anyway, especially when we were showing proof of having been encountering issues with bad hacker internet fraud likely tied to criminal implants at the courts watching for cases like ours to obstruct and also just generally having come from recession and post Covid as it were. There would be no cut-off at all stated anywhere in the code, maybe there's some line in a text that says $2,680 though just might be an official publication meant for reference and not an actual codification, as such would not make any sense anyway because that would be a gross income amount as you can read in the memorandum from the 9th COA. For instance non-profit corporations can make gross income as much as possible, with no cap whatsoever and still be non-profit as long as the difference between gross and net is under a certain amount. Likewise, if a person makes $5,000 and their expenses are solving parties $4,900 and then if somebody makes $2,000 and their expenses are $1,500 the person that makes $5,000 should be more indigent by similar law. Somebody who is a slacker and doesn't go out and try to get a family going and then sits around and sues people for a living being able to file for free just because they don't have any expenses should not be able to be a adjudged as more indigent than somebody who struggles more than they do to put forth progress who has less money on hand and arguably more cause to file.
The key difference would be the background of sovereign immunity with all of this issue going on in recession, whereas the logic would be opposite of the normal for those not in caveat...such as for the two filers as above, wherein it would be more lawful to adjudge that the person making more money with less actually on hand would be less indigent than the person making less money with more on hand due to the fact that recession would be extenuatingly more lawful versus either of their progress not in the correct caveat in recession towards secession's superluminal refederation, see. It would be technically more lawful to rule in favor of the less economically progressive party with more money on hand though less income as being more indigent even though they would not be normally. One may tell how the law has of course tropated toward this sort of logic in the courts where gross income is being used as the determinator perhaps even unbeknownst to those officials now over so many centuries, perhaps similar to how loans are being denied against non-profits just for not being tax-exempt which would be retarding otherwise.
I'm sure that's all very interesting after the consciousness vacuum, right? Lol...
At any rate, here are the case files below and we will continue to update this page. Please note that these case files are also found in the main cause page for the ongoing cases.
---------------------------
Evidence showing that the 9th Court of Appeals web page for this cause has had the hyperlinks up and that they have been taken down and placed back up at some point. Link to the case's web page also included.
We've also included the case search portal for the originating case in Montgomery County Court 4, case 25-34897 which has to be input into the search field in order to bring up the online docket.
Below we are going to post all of the filings in each of these cases just for the record.
Note that the evidence exhibits may be found on the main cause page for these cases also with these filings there as well, that page is below first.
Comments