Horse v. Electron - Rolling Up-Vote/Down-Vote Bump Admin/Mod Forum System for eGov

Forums are a perfect example of a governance micorcosm.  They are used to organize informational data for a certain purpose with regard to human users.

The forum system should be adapted to the eGov system for the future and expanded to include video and wiki databases like youtube and the wikis, as well as a social networking type of suite like facebook and then an announcement and follow board like X, all in one.  Of course, this system's internals would be continually voted upon to ensure that it continued to mold to our needs.

One of the main facets which The Exit Party has pointed out is that a large reason for our serendipitous secessionary gridlock is due to the fact that our govt cannot move as fast as the mains of the fraud it fights, which is mainly powered by the internet.  By bringing the internet to the core of our governance systems, we can even the playing field and be more federalized there.

Office term lengths were something that mainly accounted for the slower speed of information in days of horse, boat and foot travel.  These days, our information moves so, so quickly that office terms should be more flexible.  An admin/moderator forum type up-vote/down-vote and/or bump system would turn our federal government into a fast moving type of morphing blob that could morph to adapt to any sort of legal process.

Such a system would be much easier to vote into action in a secessionary atmosphere, where it could be fast-tracked into real-time processes and offices, recorded, filmed and then adopted just as quickly by other States sans the drag of Federal bureaucracy, in effect replacing it and causing the need for re-federalization to increase moreso.

Impeachment could be a thing of the past and poor performing officials could be voted out more quickly.  Then on the other hand, there could be more concrete term lengths set in stone for certain positions which are less involved with direct processes like district clerks or what have you, which should also be more customary on the other side too, with more important positions being harder to win and so harder to be removed from, more naturally.  As it stands, little bitty nuances can lead to a whole impeachment process and the whole impeachment hoora.  With a rolling voting system, the likelihood of a higher up impeachment based upon frivolty would decrease while at the same time likely increase for actual dyed issues.

Even percentages of votes necessary to constitute a vote could be voted on.  By making office term lengths more dynamic by allowing for a hybrid approach to the voting system, we could have a setup in our eGov system that would encourage greater participation in govt and its details in order to earn the up-votes and bumps of an online votership who is much more involved in the fine details of court and govt processes such as hearings and debate, as well as real live Law & Order reality trial broadcasts and valence participation.

Govt positions could be changed in their actual shape even, as mentioned with load sharing and work spreading.  Certain individuals competing for certain positions who have shown to be adept could be just grouped as the general officiality of that position of process after sometime in order to be more logical and limit too much time being spent on competition and not cooperation in the name of constitution federal, though there would become a ranking system still within such a sphere to continue competition none-the-less, with perhaps even such systems of make-it-take it being voted into process for these areas in order to better govern leadership term limits in such cutthroat areas of process and popularity.