top of page

[JUD] Juror Tiering & eGov

Mar 25, 2024
7 min read
Please read the other article in this section regarding Jury Certification and Tiering
 
This article seeks to expound upon using jury tiers to make the jury system more robust, skilled and less prone to failure.
 
Applying the idea of jury tiering throughout other advancements in this site in government processes that would be in processes of court, one could get a good feel of how it could augment and exponentially expedite the whole process of advancing our government through a secession-centered makeover and then accelerate afterward into an America 3.0 online.
 
My idea of a more stable trial would be to use jury tiers in a jury. 
 
Below is an excerpt from the other article on tiering describing how the system would work in trials:
 
A Teir I juror would be 1, and then Tier II would be 2, Teir III would be 3 and Tier IV would be 4.  Juries should be odd to aid in deliberations on a 3/4 or 2/3 system instead of a total agreement like we have now, which in my opinion is a relic of corruption, making it way too easy to pay off or even threaten a single juror to hang the jury, and even a ¾ vote comes a little close to that.  Most lower court trials could be just Tier I and Tier II, with certain cases like federal court containing just upper tier jurors.  A county civil jury could be 9 Tier I, 5 Tier II, and 3 Tier III, for a total of 17 jurors.  In that way, juries could be larger and more compact vs the total vote power, and so likely more effective, with the total number of actual votes clocking in at 28…with the power of education ruling the jury, juries would be less likely to go off course, but also the power of actual people numbers on the side of the common jury would help to prevent education’s bad side from running away in the opposite direction.  A ¾ vote would be a better option in my opinion and a nice step down from a total agreement (like we have now), requiring 21 actual votes, which could be made up of 9 Tier I, 3 Tier II and 2 Teir III…or 7 Tier I, 4 Tier II and 2 Tier III.  There could be many combinations, and that would be a good addition for these days as the mixing pot mixes, ensuring that different cadres within juries between classes such as sex and race compete with eachother and cannot combine as unfairly and tip the boat as easily.  Having lower, mid and higher classes helps to ensure that people with common sense and experience, who are likely more familiar with the actual goings on of crimes and perhaps closer to the thought processes of the criminal mind are present, who are also able to feed and draw from the more educated and intuitive higher educated classes on multiple levels, creating multi-interlocking vantage points, to mow down crime…keeping odd numbers and a ¾ majority in combination with jury certification should help to reduce trial times as well as appeals and more than make up for the larger juries taking people away from their daily lives.  Different courts could have different combinations, Federal Civil juries could be smaller and play more of cross-reference role versus a verdict role, in the spirit of federal excellence, made up of Tier II, III & IV only, the US District courts using II & III and US Circuit courts using III & IV.  For serious internal trails, using public oversight from the elite would help keep corruption’s shenanigans lower.  Law after all is a lower science and can become overrun with people who are very smart, but perhaps not smart enough to be physicists and surgeons.  Having a ton of Tier IV PHD’s, Post-doctorates and Professors in the room in internal trials would ensure that the best results are reached when it comes to trials of judges, congressmen, senators and even presidential impeachment, for trails of lower court judges, a combination of Tier III & IV would work too…and overlapping the jury tiers used as we go up the court hierarchy would ensure that these different tier classes would all intermix with eachother to encourage the macro-informational flow and informalities within society, creating more fidelity overall and eventually connecting the lowest to the highest and vice versa, so that we don’t separate.  I will add a separate post below with my ideas for jury numbers for each level of court.
 
Now, whether these exact numbers are used or not is non-plusse, who knows?  Maybe they will, maybe they won’t, but the idea in my mind is a good one if we really want to get our people serious about fine tuning.  Anyone who has ever put together a cosplay costume can tell you that attention to detail is critical…or really any artist can tell you that.  This next era will be an interesting one as the world comes together under one government, and the US system should be the best model, with the US having been the world’s forerunner in technology overall, even though lately we have faltered a bit…albeit most likely due to the labor it takes to conjure things for the future that no one might quite know exactly how to do, almost like trying to listen to an invisible language, or to be led by the eddies of a butterfly’s wing for thousands of miles through the arms of time…getting a little turned around to get to the right place could pass as acceptable, if not expected. 
As the world ubiquifies, boundaries will be less and less physical, until they are the actual person, family, organization, clan, tribe, cult, firm ziabatsu or what have you.  That might be very far off, but likely you will see people start to buy mobile permanent addresses or at the very least travel much farther and work from home most of the time, and very well a correlated group’s property could be treated the way districts are now.  One of my long term dreams is to see flying houses come about that use water to store on-demand hydrogen with the new prospects of fusion and net-energy from atomics…that might be way down the line but there are novel internal wing designs and special airfoil skins that have not been fully tested yet such as the custer wing which generate copious amounts of lift, so much so that remaining aloft at relatively slow speeds for days at a time on one arial refill might not be as far off as one might think, especially if those designs are combined with further out tech like HF levitation and condensate reuptake systems.  That might be in my old age but you can see how static borders would have a hard time governing people who had property across a continent or more.  Likely extended family networks would be treated as virtual jurisdictions, and the really old old tribal traditions would make a comeback for local officials being elected, appointed, etc…a glorious day in law that will be, with alot of revamping to do to be able to control tendencies for people to favor their own in legal proceedings.  That time will come though.
Advanced tech that must stay aloft for days and days on end will need very stringent protocols for manufacturing, inspection and maintenance…accidents are going to happen and medicine will need to have evolved into areas that are very touchy such as cloning and regeneration tech.  Having technical trials involving alot of data about subjects which take years to even begin to understand, like vector physics or genetics will be something that will need to happen in a manner that will suit the best ends. We aren’t going to meet those ends if we have jurors who don’t know anything about what the trial is about, or who at least would not be able to realistically enough.  Then again, an educated person might not be as experienced with other types of trials, or even be able to handle hearing them, like certain crimes involving clone tech being abused undocumentedly, that is a given.  Suffice to say though, consumer standards these days are a spitting example of failures in the court systems to curb manufacturers insatiable greed and self-control…their tendencies to do things like make the same part just hair different for a new model in order to make short money for they and theirs has made the rest of us work overtime doing work we probably didn’t have to do.  Planned obsolescence has been given time to be perfected and catching onto it likely never got off because explaining parts of an engine to people who have never worked on one, or even found the time to work on anything because of higher fraud in the Fed is just not going to happen, especially when these designers have done things specifically to make people trying to accuse them sound insane…and people on the other side are already schitz from the same higher fraud that has made them dumb, and so writing things off to save their own faces from melting is easier, which trended us to where we are now.  Shoot, even when you do have a room full of experts who know what’s up it’s still hard to get them to come together and help out these days…and the big tech companies just go back to their bad habits and technologies cutting edge is not carefully sharpened.
 
Tiered juries and the incorporation of online eGov public, real-time viewing of higher profile trials that will allow viewers to interact passively with court assistants, eachother and perhaps more WILL give a finer layer and heightened capability to those trials, and help them achieve better results much faster, as well as be highly entertaining and bring families and extended networks together for further progress and family making at the end of the day.  Who knows, maybe the advanced, virtual city-states of the future’s united world using evolutions of the US Federal/State system will find their roots in these technical trials

Recent Posts

See All
re:SearchTX - a Handy Tool for Case Research!

Find out who's who for your pro se civil depredation cases. Find out which judge is naught and which one is nice so you can win. See who's sovereign and who's been familiarized with the Article III pr

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page